No Fracking Way

Fracking Produces More Radioactive Waste than Nuclear Power Plants

by Chip Northrup on May 4, 2014

fracking worse than nuclear power A frack load more. Every fracking day. 

Fracking puts more hazardous radioactive material into the environment than all the US nuclear power plants combined. About a Fukushima worth a month. Another Chernobyl every six months. Three Mile Island ? Fracking child’s play: one truckload of processed frack sludge has more radioactive material in it than all the leakage at Three Mile Island.

The US nuclear industry produces about 2,000 tons of hazardous waste a year that has to be stored in a secure location. A frack truck can haul about 22 tons of processed sludge –  that requires storage in a hazardous radioactive waste facility. So a convoy 100 frack trucks carries the equivalent volume of a year’s supply of nuclear industry waste.

That plus the fatalities from fracking, gas compressor explosions, and gas line blasts make fracked gas by far the deadliest form of energy in the US. A bigger body count in a month than nuclear energy in 50 years. More fatalities in a quarter than coal in a year.

More accidents in a year than in the entire history of the solar and wind energy industries, world-wide.

We are not talking about the theoretical release of radioactive material into the air and water. We are talking about an industry that is effectively mining radium – billions of pounds of radioactive material as a byproduct of drilling horizontal wells through shale. Then processing those radioactive materials into even more concentrated hazardous radioactive sludge.

Processed radioactive drilling waste is a form of TENORM (“technologically enhanced naturally occurring radioactive material”)—that is, naturally occurring radioactive material (NORM) that has been concentrated or otherwise made more accessible to human exposure.

Even the water that comes back as flowback from shale wells is radioactive. The radioactivity of shale brine in New York is as high as 15,000 picocuries per liter. The background radiation at the surface of is about 1 picocurie per liter.

Unlike nuclear waste, frack waste is very loosely regulated. The feds barely regulate it and the state regulators get the fat envelopes to look the other way. So a lot of fracking’s radioactive legacy just gets dumped: In a river, on roads, in landfills, or abandoned barn near you. Plus fracking is a great way to cook a planet. 

So much for “Clean Energy.” Has your town or county banned frack waste ? What are you waiting on ? Another frackastrophe ?

How Fracking Is Exposing People to Radioactive Waste

Full story here by Tara Lohan

Radiation from fracking is accumulating in the water we drink, the fish we eat, and the soil in which our food grows.
radioactive frack waste

There isn’t a lot of good news about fracking lately. Another train with volatile fracked crude oil from North Dakota’s Bakken Shale exploded in Lynchburg, Virginia igniting a ball of fire on the surface of the James River. Accidents involving these “bomb trains” are becoming commonplace. So are recent studies indicating serious health risks  from fracking andreports linking fracking to earthquakes.

With all that press you may have missed another cause for alarm: radiation risks. The oil and gas-drilling boom, aided by the practice of fracking, has unleashed billions of gallons and millions of tons  of hazardous radioactive waste into our environment – on a daily basis. 

Fracking involves injecting millions of gallons of water, sand, and chemicals at high pressure deep underground to break apart shale and release trapped hydrocarbons like oil and gas. But the process can also bring to the surface water that is laced with radioactive materials that were in the shale. In small, dispersed quantities low-level radiation is not life threatening, but what happens when those quantities are recycled, processed and start increasing in the environment, and getting into the water we drink, the fish we eat, and the soil in which our food grows?

Scientists are trying to figure that out. But it’s a difficult process to track since fracking isn’t regulated under most federal environmental laws like the Safe Drinking Water Act and the Clean Water Act. That means industry is charge of policing itself a lot of the time.

Another problem is that it’s really hard to keep track of all the stuff that may become tainted by radioactive materials in the drilling process. Millions of gallons of soupy wastewater that flow back from wells after drilling and fracking can end up in a number of places. Sometimes the wastewater is simply left in lined or unlined pits to either evaporate or sink back into the ground. Other times it is sent to water treatment plants and eventually released back into rivers and streams. At times it is simply spilled or illegally dumped. It also ends up contaminating drilling mud (a more solid waste from the process), storage tanks, and equipment.

“Radionuclides in these wastes are primarily radium-226, radium-228, and radon gas,” reports the Environmental Protection Agency. “The radon is released to the atmosphere, while the produced water and mud containing radium are placed in ponds or pits for evaporation, reuse, or recovery.” Or spread on the roads as de-icer in winter and dust suppressant in summer. 

The fact that drilling for oil or gas increases radiation is not news. Avner Vengosh, a professor of geochemistry at Duke University told Bloomberg News that we’ve know that since the 1970s, but the pace and intensity of drilling now, combined with the huge amount of wastewater, is taking the issue to a new level of concern. “We are actually building up a legacy of radioactivity in hundreds of points where people have had leaks or spills around the country,” he said.

Vengosh was part of team of researchers that turned up some troubling findings in Pennsylvania, ground zero for hydraulic fracturing in the Marcellus Shale. Their study, published in the peer-reviewed journal Environmental Science & Technology, took samples over a two-year period from Blacklick Creek just below the discharge from the Josephine Brine Treatment Facility, which accepted water from drilling operations. They found that radium levels of wastewater from fracking operations had been reduced in treatment by about 90 percent, but what was coming out of the plant still exceeded upstream levels by 200 times. And several billions gallons of radioactive sludge is involved. Yearly.

“Such elevated levels of radioactivity are above regulated levels and would normally be seen at licensed radioactive disposal facilities, according to the scientists at Duke University’s Nicholas school of the environment in North Carolina,” reported Felicity Carus for the Guardian.

The biggest threat is the bioaccumulation of radium, which horizontal wells effectively mine with the shale. Small quantities can build up in the environment, eventually posing a health hazard (especially if it ends up in food we eat).

It also means that even if you don’t have a drilling rig in your backyard or even your neighborhood, you may still face some risks. As Carus wrote:

From January to June 2013, the 4,197 unconventional gas wells in Pennsylvania reported 3.5m barrels of fluid waste and 10.7m barrels of “produced” fluid. Most of that waste is disposed of within Pennsylvania, but some of it is also went to other states, such as Ohio and New York despite its moratorium on shale gas exploration. In July, a treatment company in New York state pleaded guilty to falsifying more than 3,000 water tests.

The Duke study came just two years after the New York Times did an exhaustive search of thousands of government and industry documents to try and assess how risky radioactive wastewater from fracking may be.

Got radium ?

Got radium ?

“The documents reveal that the wastewater, which is sometimes hauled to sewage plants not designed to treat it and then discharged into rivers that supply drinking water, contains radioactivity at levels higher than previously known, and far higher than the level that federal regulators say is safe for these treatment plants to handle,” Ian Urbina wrote for the Times. Or trucked from Pennsylvania to a radioactive waste facility in Idaho.

“The Times also found never-reported studies by the EPA and a confidential study by the drilling industry that all concluded that radioactivity in drilling waste cannot be fully diluted in rivers and other waterways.” They found that 116 wells produced wastewater with levels more than 100 times higher than safe drinking water standards, and 15 wells were more than 1,000 times above the limit.

“The radioactivity in the wastewater is not necessarily dangerous to people who are near it. It can be blocked by thin barriers, including skin, so exposure is generally harmless,” wroteUrbina. “Rather, E.P.A. and industry researchers say, the bigger danger of radioactive wastewater is its potential to contaminate drinking water or enter the food chain through fish or farming. Once radium enters a person’s body, by eating, drinking or breathing, it can cause cancer and other health problems, many federal studies show.”

The Duke study and the Times’ research both focused on Pennsylvania, but the Marcellus region is not the only experiencing problems with radioactive waste. In February, an abandoned building in Noonan, North Dakota was found to contain bags of illegally dumped “filter socks” which are used by the industry to filter liquids during oil production. The radiation level from the material wasn’t high enough to be a health hazard unless people ventured into the building but it signals a growing problem for boomtowns, the likes of which have emerged across North Dakota’s Bakken shale. It’s not the first time this kind of waste has been dumped — and the booming Bakken is producing around 27 tons of filter socks a day, by one estimate.

And the problem persists across the country.

“While it’s unclear how much drilling waste is produced nationally, state totals are rising. West Virginia landfills accepted 721,000 tons of drilling debris in 2013, a figure that doesn’t include loads rejected because they topped radiation limits,” wrote Alex Nussbaum for Bloomberg. “The per-month tonnage more than tripled from July 2012, when records were first kept, through last December. In Pennsylvania, epicenter of the Marcellus boom, the oil and gas industry sent 1.3 million tons to landfills last year.” Are those facilities equipped to monitor and handle radioactive waste?

North Dakota is attempting to cope with the problem by creating new regulations requiring industry to store these contaminated filter socks on site in special containers until they can be moved to a “certified dump.” But, Rebecca Leber writes for Think Progress, “North Dakota has no facilities to process this level of radioactive waste. According to the Wall Street Journal, the closest facilities are hundreds of miles away in states like Idaho, Colorado, Utah, and Montana.”

So the problem is not solved, it’s simply trucked from one state to the next — increasing the area that may be affected and the number of people. Meanwhile the grand experiment of fracking’s effects on human health continues.

Tara Lohan is a freelance writer and former senior editor at AlterNet. She is the editor of two books on the global water crisis, including Water Matters: Why We Need to Act Now to Save Our Most Critical Resource.radioactive frack waste


{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }

DIANE ESSER September 11, 2015 at 8:00 am

I have used this article as a reference for a video I did on Freshwater. See my facebook: EXCELLENT JOURNALISM!!!


Rita Varley November 16, 2015 at 10:48 am

This should sound the death knell for fracking. It is flaming insanity. No industry on earth has the right to risk putting radioactive material into the drinking water of millions and millions of people. This should be the headline in all the PA newspapers and people should rise up screaming to end the fracking business. It is hideously unfair to destroy all the businesses already operating in PA–the farmers of veggies and livestock in order to force us all to accept fracking jobs. (When counting fracking jobs, do you subtract all the other jobs people already had which get ruined???) It is hideous to destroy innocent wildlife as well. WHY ON EARTH DO WE KEEP PRETENDING FRACKING IS AN ECONOMIC BENEFIT WHEN IT IS SO HARMFUL AND WE DO NOT NEED IT–WHEN WE COULD BE TURNING TO RENEWABLE ENERGY AND PROVIDE EVEN MORE VERY NICE JOBS??? I did call the Philadelphia water department and they do test for radioactivity (though I don’t know how often). The trouble is–if we find out it is there, what on earth are we going to do about it? It would be a towering crisis, a tragic catastrophe. HOW ON EARTH CAN WE THINK RISKING THIS IS ACCEPTABLE?? IT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE IN ANY FORM. Quit the damn fracking business.


Beverly LaClair November 17, 2015 at 9:07 pm

Another one of the wonderful legacy’s of Mr. Cheney and Halliburton. From what I have read, Halliburton developed the Fracking procedure while Cheney was CEO of the company. No wonder he wanted to be in the WH. He controlled the meeting in 2005 and was able to ram rod all the secret “rules” and lack of information available to the public and important government regulating agencies, including blocking identification of the chemicals being used and dumped into our environment, to the WPA.
I remember questioning and saying to others, what is he hiding? It can’t be good and/or must be illegal if it has to be hidden to that extent.
You are right!!! Fracking is NOT ACCEPTABLE and is doing too much damage to the planet and must be stopped NOW!!!


Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: