No Fracking Way

Fracking Central Park ?

by Chip Northrup on December 16, 2012

UPDATE: Shale Gas Mythbusters are coming to Central Park West this Thursday, 2  64th Street at Central Park West, 6:30 PM.

See you there ! (54) New York Shale Gas Potential: How Does it Compare to Pennsylvania?

New York Society for Ethical Culture

2 West 64th Street, 6:30–9 pm, Doors open 6:00 pm  Come early and enjoy the Gotham City Pickers Band.

Moderated by Prof. Anthony Ingraffea
Presentations by Chip Northrup, Brian Brock, Jerry Acton, Lou Allstadt                             
Sponsored by:
New York Society for Ethical Culture
Co-Sponsors:
State Senators Tony Avella, Adriano Espaillat; Assembly Members Richard Gottfried, Linda Rosenthal, Deborah Glick; Manhattan Borough President Gale Brewer; City Council Members Corey Johnson, Benjamin Kallos, Mark Levine, Rosie Mendez; Helen Rosenthal The League of Women Voters of NYS; The League of Women Voters of NYC; Women’s City Club of New York; The Coalition for a Livable West Side; Brooklyn Food Coalition;
The Gray Panthers NYC Green Sanctuary Committee, Community Church of New York Unitarian Universalist; Judson Memorial Church; New York Friends in Unity with Nature; NYC Grassroots Alliance

“A FOIL request of the DEC has uncovered two shale gas well permit applications in New York City’s Central Park. The address on the first application is given as “Central Park West at W. 62nd Street.”  The second is an address on Central Park East. The mineral rights owner is listed as “New York City” and the mineral leases are to “N. Bedford Forrest Operating Company, of Guthrie, Oklahoma,”  ably represented by The Law Firm of Tom West. The applications are shown as exploratory or “wildcat” tests of the Olmsted Shale, a formation of which little is known in Midtown. Target depth is 10,000 feet, which would require one of the biggest land rigs available to be brought up from the Eagle Ford field in South Texas, possibly by barge up the Hudson River.

Based on the DEC’s proposed fracking regulationsthe proposed HVHF applications would be acceptable to the Department of Mineral Resources director Brad “Flat Earth” Fieldsince the drill pad sites are more than 500 feet from the nearest “inhabited dwellings”  on either Central Park West or East, and are more than 500 feet from the nearest “places of assembly,” Lincoln Center or the Oak Bar at the Plaza.

We submitted questions to DEC spokesperson Emo deSallis, who was surprisingly responsive, answering almost immediately and with uncharacteristic candor:

NFW: Do the applications meet all of the requirements of Cuomo’s proposed fracking regs. ?

deSallis:  “Yes, the pad sites are 500 feet from any inhabited dwelling or a place of assembly. They are not in the watershed of the New York City reservoir. Both applications qualify per the proposed setbacks in Section 560.4.”

NFW: Will there be an SEQRA on the applications ?

deSallis: “This falls within the guidelines of the SGEIS. No SEQRA required.”

NFW:  The Central Park East permit appears to be across the street from The Pierre Hotel.

deSallis: “Hotels are not “dwellings” so they are not protected uses in the regulations.

NFW: What about the Jackie O Reservoir ?

deSallis: “No longer used for drinking water. The applicant plans to pump flowback into it. ”

NFW: Really ?

deSallis (snickering): “It won’t freeze. . . .”

NFW: The CPW drill pad location appears to be next to or on top of the softball fields.

deSallis: “Playing fields are not a protected use by the DEC.

NFW: What about The Pond at W. 59th ?

deSallis: “Ponds are not protected under the regs. That is the site of the second permit application. They are going to drain it. ”

NFW:  Isn’t fracking banned in New York City ?

deSallis: “The Mayor signed the lease. It’s part of Hizzoner’s gaseous promotion of safe fracking.

NFW: What’s good for the Catskills is good for Manhattan

deSallis: “Something like that.”

NFW:  What about the fracking flowback ?

deSallis: “They propose to take the frack waste on barges  to a municipal treatment plant.”

NFW: Are these horizontal wells ?

deSallis: “If they test well, they intend to run the laterals north.”

NFW: How far ?

deSallis: “Harlem. The Apollo at 125th Street.”  

NFW: Under the statue of Alice ?

deSallis: “Pretty much parallel to the A Train.” A phone rang. “Have to go, it’s Fred Dicker at the Post.”

NFW: Thanks for your time.

deSalls: “No problem.”

Mark Ohe’s rendering of what the Central Park West well site would look like: 

“CPW # 1 Olmsted Shale Test” N.Bedford Forrest, LLC, Guthrie, Oklahoma. 

 

Mark’s rendering of  the Central Park East “PierreView #1, Olmsted Shale Test” 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

About a year ago I pointed out that, based on the September 2011 draft regulations, you could get a permit to drill a shale gas well in Central Park. Independently, Mark Ohe speculated on what that might look like, and I wrote the copy  as an example of what the regs. would allow. Note that since the setback of the well pad is 500 feet, the imaginary wells shown could in fact be permitted, since the well pad could be set back sufficiently far from the “dwellings” on the street, or the “places of assembly”. As noted, there are no setbacks from ponds, ball fields, etc. – so none of the other features in the Park would preclude permitting a shale gas well. Which is the point of the piece: absent better protections or a town ban, this is what other communities face under the proposed regulations. This is what Central Park would look like in Upstate. Cute huh ?  

{ 9 comments… read them below or add one }

Stuart Anderson December 16, 2012 at 9:29 pm

If the sauce is good enough for the goose, it is good enough for the gander…..maybe the Gov and Bloomie should let NYC lead the fracking way!

Reply

Chip Northrup December 16, 2012 at 10:08 pm

“We’ll frack Manhattan, the Bronx and Staten Island too,
It’s time to frack the frackin’ Brooklyn Zoo. . .

That might get their fracking attention. . . .

Reply

FrackFighter December 16, 2012 at 10:47 pm

Anything in the regs about carriage rides?

Reply

Chip Northrup December 16, 2012 at 11:06 pm

not a peep, nor bike/ bridal paths, nor statues of Alice. In other words, not nuttin,’ frack ‘em !

Reply

FrackBuster December 17, 2012 at 12:48 am

I understand a statue of Ayn Rand has been proposed for the entry to one of the wells and another will be graced by a bronze of Alan Greenspan in memory of their “unselflessness” on the altar of free enterprise.

Reply

Chip Northrup December 17, 2012 at 9:05 am

That is correct. Any Rand is like a god to Mr. Forrest. Mr. Greenspan is on the Forrest Operating board and was instrumental in securing the drilling permits.

Reply

dana lacroix December 17, 2012 at 1:59 pm

Fracking has been proven unsafe time and again. The DEC has proven incompetent, time and again.

I just spoke with our Albany DEC inspector, Jeff McCullough, regarding a local motorcycle project,about which I have concerns. The track filed a 6.06 acre swpp. The track is 2.1 miles long and 36 feet wide. Do the math. Mr. Mucullough told me on the phone that there is no inspection report on the track and he doesn’t have to file one. I’m guessing this is how the inspection of fracking sites will be handled.

While the DEC is assessing risks, I suggest the department also assess their ability to enforce regulations. A REGULATION IS ONLY AS GOOD AT THE ENFORCING AGENCY. Based on DEC history, and my own personal experience with them, regulation of fracking sites will be nothing more than pro-forma lip service. Does that make you feel safe, fellow New Yorkers?

Reply

FrackFighter December 17, 2012 at 2:20 pm

Last night I re-imagined Sydney’s late night “naked prey” race through the park in “Where’s Poppa?”
Added a whole new dimension.

Reply

Chip Northrup December 22, 2012 at 12:22 pm

they’d be exposed by the glow of the flaring wells

Reply

Leave a Comment

WP-SpamFree by Pole Position Marketing

{ 1 trackback }

Previous post:

Next post: