No Fracking Way

Truthyland: Fracks, Lies and Videotape

by Chip Northrup on August 3, 2012

Truthyland aka “Truthland” was screened publicly in Syracuse to an audience of eleven (11), then in Buffalo to an evidently skeptical audience of thirty (30), who laughed their way through most of the film. Here are some highlights from the Q&A session that was punctuated by the audience heckling the panel of fracking shills, the panel of shills heckling the audience, the Energy in Depth spokesman heckling a questioner, and the host calling armed, bullet-proof-vested security guards to maintain truthiness.

Truthyland frack flaks were Dennis “The Fracking Menace” Holbrook, “Stunt Man” Holko and Scott “Easy on the Eyeliner ?” Cline, a local DIMBY = drill in my back yard. Truthyland narrator Mrs. DePue fled the scene before the Q&A started and the armed guards arrived. But she deserves an Oscar for her performance in the infomercial: she plays dumb about how gas wells leak, when she knows more about leaking gas wells - her own annulus was bubbling - than anyone in the movie.

First comment is from Buck Quigley, addressing Dennis Holbrook of Norse Energy, a gas prospector in New York, regarding Norse’s role in using their employee, Prof. Robert Jacobi, a geologist at the University of Buffalo to set up a “shale institute” at UB - to get more truthy than Norse - or Holbrook - were capable of themselves. Buck is reading from Holbrook’s speech to the industry about how to set up such industry-friendly partnerships with universities, effectively contaminating the academic’s credibility. Holbrook offered no explanation. Even truthy frackers are sometimes at a loss for truthiness. Until their fracking shale shill sons come to their aide online. Anonymously. Until Buck outed him too.

http://splicd.com/azhXm9uEOJI/3273/3480

Second comment is from Prof. Holstun of UB, who asks Holbrook how Norse got UB to form its Shale $hamstitute. Holbrook dodges the question, by rambling on truthily about the gas industry’s PR efforts” to buy credibility by using frackademics to write reports favorable to frackers. Imagine that. When re-asked about offering money to UB to form the shale institute, Holbrook dissembles, implying that the UB geology department contacted Norse to from a shale institute, separately from Jacobi - when UB geologist Robert Jacobi was already on the Norse payroll. Just a coinky-dink according to Dennis the Fracking Menace.

http://splicd.com/azhXm9uEOJI/4275/4514

Third question was how the panelist could justify supporting a fracking mockumentary that was made by an industry PR group, Energy in Depth, as being anything other than gas industry propaganda. None of the panelist - who were there to promote the truthiness of Truthyland - could answer that.

http://splicd.com/azhXm9uEOJI/2787/3000

Fourth question was about the hazards of horizontal gas wells. Panelist Scott Cline’s response was the standard “bait & switch” truthy gambit - “that the industry has been doing all this for decades and that horizontal shale wells are better than conventional vertical wells, blah, blah.” This sort of truthiness is designed to lull people into the notion that a horizontal shale well, which takes thousands of truck loads to drill and frack, is the same as a small vertical well, which takes dozens of truckloads to drill and frack. Or that a horizontal shale well - as Cline implies truthily - is more environmentally benign, uses less pressure, etc. All of this is truthless. A horizontal shale gas well is 4 times more prone to leak than a vertical well. He states that a mile long horizontal shale lateral “replaces” 32 vertical shale gas wells. That’s a flagrantly truthy comparison - because there is no such thing as a vertical shale gas well. Shale is drilled and fracked horizontally, because that’s the only way for it to be marginally economic. As another audience member pointed out, when the wells are not economic - their risk/ reward ratio goes negative: there is no economic benefit from drilling uneconomic shale wells - only environmental costs to roads, water supplies and land uses. While the Ponzi gas goes to China . . .

http://splicd.com/azhXm9uEOJI/3743/3838

Fifth question is about methane contamination from gas wells, which was, of course the problem with the Truthyland narrator’s wells. Scott Cline says that there is less methane near gas wells, citing one test in Otsego County, which was an anomaly in the Duke methane study - a test well which was also cited in the dSGEIS. This is classic The Sky is Pink, truthy-speak - implying that gas wells improve water quality. He also says that local water wells are drilled into shale - releasing methane, which is not the case - New York’s shallow water wells do not tap gas bearing formations. But his answer is an admission that drilling through shale releases gas into water. Which is exactly what horizontal shale gas wells are good at. Leaking. Even on the Truthless narrator’s property.

http://splicd.com/azhXm9uEOJI/1326/1464

Sixth question addresses inspection, the panelists had made a big truthy deal about how many regulatory agencies have oversight - naming several that have no direct oversight in New York over drilling - so the questioner asks who is really going to inspect fracking in New York. The first answer, from Lenape Energy’s “Stunt Man” Holko about the historical lack of major incidents in New York, does not answer the question, and is not entirely correct, New York has a history of gas well problems, thousands of orphaned, leaking gas wells, the worst fracking regulations in America, one of the worst regulatory agencies of any state that is chronically understaffed and underfunded, with less frequent inspections than other states. Holbrook repeats another big lie: that the 15 DEC well inspectors will not be swamped by shale gas industrialization, and another whopper, that “New York state has a production tax to pay for the cost of such state inspections”, when New York is the only state with no state tax on gas production. So, unlike other states, the state has no money from the industry to inspect wells, no money to repair state roads - all of those costs are off-loaded by industry onto the taxpayers of New York. The industry will declare minimal income tax in New York state, because none of the major frackers are domiciled in New York, and all of them have extra-truthy tax accountants capable of avoiding paying New York state income tax. The regs. themselves of course were written by the gas industry, and New York is one of the only states without an autonomous independent environmental agency to oversee shale gas industrialization. What could possibly go wrong ?

http://splicd.com/azhXm9uEOJI/2401/2678

Seventh question about the problems with the film narrator’s wells. (The Truthyland narrator had bolted before questions started). Which gave the Truthless panel an opportunity to be truthy about the problems with the narrator’s wells. ‘Stunt Man” Holko in particular acts convincingly clueless about the documented violations with the wells and the lawsuit over water contamination on the neighbor’s property. Throughout the documentary, the narrator likewise played dumb about the problems with her own gas wells, when she knows more about how gas wells leak than most of the “experts” she interviews. Scott Cline jumps the shark to state that Ms. DePue is “not aware of any problems whatsoever with her gas wells” - when she was a poster girl for gas well problems before she made the infomercial. But the shale $hills on the Truthyland panel played dumb about that. Not much of a stretch for any of them.

http://splicd.com/azhXm9uEOJI/4142/4262

If you are old enough, these industry denials and prevarications may seem eerily familiar. Which is not a coincidence in Truthyland.

 

{ 13 comments… read them below or add one }

TXsharon August 3, 2012 at 4:42 pm

In the second clip Holbrook claims he was trying to fill a gap in knowledge. I wonder how many times UB sought out flesh and blood people who live and breathe and drink near fracking to help fill that knowledge gap?

Reply

Chip Northrup August 3, 2012 at 9:38 pm

They found their spokesman in Ms.DePue and her husband Pepe.

Reply

Jim Holstun August 3, 2012 at 5:17 pm

At one point, Mr. Holbrook says that, if Einstein himself were speaking while employed by industry, the fanatics would mistrust him. Two problems here: Einstein worked for the Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton, not for Norse Energy-that may be why we never heard him shilling for gas. And Mr. Holbrook, you’re no Einstein.

Reply

Chip Northrup August 3, 2012 at 9:34 pm

Most of the studies coming from frackademia are transparently flawed. The UT study consisted primarily of industry brochures stapled together. The UB study was literally and industry PR piece reheated as an academic paper by some frackademics - not even an original piece of lying. The industry bought about 15 minutes of credibility with these forays into frackademia.

Reply

Otegogas August 3, 2012 at 9:12 pm

The gas industry has ZERO credibility - they have been lying for years and have finaly now been caught, and this is why they are screaming so loud anytime anyone says anything that portrays them in their true light.

Before “Gasland” was “Split Estate”, and both films depict the true reality of living in one of America’s gaslands.

As history has shown, the bigger the lie and the more frequently it is stated, the more likely it is that people will come to believe it. Such is the gas industry’s legacy.

Next to the lies told by our government about what happened on 9/11, the gas industry is running the biggest scam of the century when they talk about “safe & responsible” gas drilling, which has about as much validity as does the discussion of “clean coal”.

Reply

Chip Northrup August 3, 2012 at 9:29 pm

The fracker’s strategy is to deny everything. So they dutifully stick to the same hokey script - even when what they say is patently ridiculous. . .

Reply

William Huston August 4, 2012 at 2:51 am

The Director of the NY Associations of Counties,
Stephen “Fracks are your Friends!” Acquario,
advises that when you have a crisis, to “get out in front of it”, and own it.

http://williamahuston.blogspot.com/2012/07/re-fracks-are-your-friends-and-other.html

Which is exactly what our friends at EID are doing
over the Buffalo “Truthiness-land” PR trainwreck:

http://eidmarcellus.org/marcellus-shale/truthland-refreshments-did-i-mention-police/11573/

Reply

Chip Northrup August 4, 2012 at 3:08 am

The audience is staying away in droves from Truthless - so the producers don’t have to worry about many people seeing it

Much less taking it seriously

Reply

TXsharon August 4, 2012 at 3:26 am

Here is another important point from the PSYOPS tapes: From Kehs - There is a constituency for drilling. There isn’t a constituency for fracking. Fracking is not an optional process. Don’t talk about fracking, talk about drilling.

So we have to connect the dots between fracking and all the myriad problems.

Reply

Chip Northrup August 4, 2012 at 11:58 am

The fracking shills do not even like to call it “fracking” . . .

But it’s the frack truck convoys, spills, earthquakes, flowback dumped on roads and rotting well bores, etc. that are the problems.

No wells drilled or fracked without all that nonsense.

Reply

Denise Katzman August 5, 2012 at 3:47 pm

Chip’s scientific and legal based analytics are the priceless moments of our New Normal.
FRACin’ is Unsafe Sex. LuV Chip’s humor Fracks, Lies and Videotape.
I worked at MIRAMAX when Sex, Lies and Videotape (SLV) won the Palme d’Or @ the Cannes Film Festival. Back in Manhattan - SLV played at one theatre and became a Box Office champ. SLV made Steven Soderbergh’s career.

Double entendre branding will always haunt the creator(s) of Truthland.

Denise Katzman
Climate Justice equals Social Justice™
SaneEnergyProject.org

Reply

Chip Northrup August 6, 2012 at 12:42 pm

SLV was a great movie

Truthyland, by contrast, has bombed when shown to the public in New York.

At Syracuse, the audience was about twice the number of the panelists and reporters.

No plans for screenings in any other cities, but would expect a similar reception. . .

Reply

Chip Northrup August 9, 2012 at 9:49 pm

And then there were the comments after the show online - by The Son of Frackenstein

Dennis the Frackin’ Menace’s Shale Shill Son . . .

http://blogs.artvoice.com/avdaily/2012/08/09/like-fracker-like-son/

Reply

Leave a Comment

{ 2 trackbacks }

Previous post:

Next post: